Negotiable Instruments Act — Part 2 MCQs with Explanations
Practice high-yield Law & Jurisprudence MCQs on Negotiable Instruments Act — Part 2 with worked academic solutions for Civil Judge, ADPP, FPSC, PPSC, CSS.
Questions
40
Difficulty Level
Exam-Level
Target Exams
Civil Judge, ADPP, FPSC...
Estimated Time
48 mins
Exam-Level Civil Judge ADPP FPSC PPSC CSS
Verified for Commission Syllabus • Oct 14, 2026
40
Verified Practice Questions
Interactive test mode with detailed academic worked solutions
Live Progress|0/40 answered
✓0 correct
✗0 wrong
0% score
🎉 Set complete! All 40 questions answered.
Question 1 of 40
★ Civil Judge
★ ADPP
★ Civil Judge
★ ADPP
Validity of Cheque is 6 months.
Correct Answer: Option B — False
Detailed Academic Explanation:
False is the correct answer to “Validity of Cheque is 6 months.”. This question is standard in competitive examination syllabi for Negotiable Instruments Act.
💡Key Conceptual Anchor:Negotiable Instruments Act
Question 2 of 40
★ Civil Judge
★ ADPP
★ Civil Judge
★ ADPP
Under Section 138 of the Act, maximum term of imprisonment is:
Correct Answer: Option B — Two years
Detailed Academic Explanation:
Two years is the correct answer to “Under Section 138 of the Act, maximum term of imprisonment is:”. This question is standard in competitive examination syllabi for Negotiable Instruments Act.
💡Key Conceptual Anchor:Negotiable Instruments Act
Question 3 of 40
★ Civil Judge
★ ADPP
★ Civil Judge
★ ADPP
Under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act 1881 Maximum punishment of imprisonment and fine is
Correct Answer: Option D — 2 year and twice the amount of cheque
Detailed Academic Explanation:
2 year and twice the amount of cheque is the correct answer to “Under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act 1881 Maximum punishment of imprisonment and fine is”. This question is standard in competitive examination syllabi for Negotiable Instruments Act.
💡Key Conceptual Anchor:Negotiable Instruments Act
Question 4 of 40
★ Civil Judge
★ ADPP
★ Civil Judge
★ ADPP
The term 'Negotiable instrument' is defined in the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, under section
Correct Answer: Option B — 13
Detailed Academic Explanation:
13 is the correct answer to “The term 'Negotiable instrument' is defined in the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, under section”. This question is standard in competitive examination syllabi for Negotiable Instruments Act.
💡Key Conceptual Anchor:Negotiable Instruments Act
Question 5 of 40
★ Civil Judge
★ ADPP
★ Civil Judge
★ ADPP
Which one of the following is not the essential requirement to fulfil an instrument intended to be a Promissory Note?
Correct Answer: Option B — A mere acknowledgement of indebtedness is sufficient
Detailed Academic Explanation:
A mere acknowledgement of indebtedness is sufficient is the correct answer to “Which one of the following is not the essential requirement to fulfil an instrument intended to be a Promissory Note”. This question is standard in competitive examination syllabi for Negotiable Instruments Act.
💡Key Conceptual Anchor:Negotiable Instruments Act
Question 6 of 40
★ Civil Judge
★ ADPP
★ Civil Judge
★ ADPP
In which of the following cases, did the Hon'ble Supreme Court decide the issue of territorial jurisdiction of the court to entertain a complaint under the Negotiable Instruments Act in reference to the Amending Ordinance of 2015?
Correct Answer: Option A — (2016) 2 SCC 75, Bridgestone India Pvt. Ltd. v. Inderpal Singh
Detailed Academic Explanation:
(2016) 2 SCC 75, Bridgestone India Pvt. Ltd. v. Inderpal Singh is the correct answer to “In which of the following cases, did the Hon'ble Supreme Court decide the issue of territorial jurisdiction of the court to entertain a complaint under the Negotiable Instruments Act in reference to the Amending Ordinance of 2015”. This question is standard in competitive examination syllabi for Negotiable Instruments Act.
💡Key Conceptual Anchor:Negotiable Instruments Act
Question 7 of 40
★ Civil Judge
★ ADPP
★ Civil Judge
★ ADPP
Under Section 97 of Negotiable Instruments Act when the party to whom notice of dishonor is dispatched is dead, but the party dispatching the notice is ignorant of his death, then
Correct Answer: Option B — The Notice is sufficient
Detailed Academic Explanation:
The Notice is sufficient is the correct answer to “Under Section 97 of Negotiable Instruments Act when the party to whom notice of dishonor is dispatched is dead, but the party dispatching the notice is ignorant of his death, then”. This question is standard in competitive examination syllabi for Negotiable Instruments Act.
💡Key Conceptual Anchor:Negotiable Instruments Act
Question 8 of 40
★ Civil Judge
★ ADPP
★ Civil Judge
★ ADPP
As per the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, when the day on which a promissory note or bill of exchange is at maturity is a public holiday, the instrument shall be deemed tobe due on the . . . . . . . . .
Correct Answer: Option D — Next preceding business day
Detailed Academic Explanation:
Next preceding business day is the correct answer to “As per the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, when the day on which a promissory note or bill of exchange is at maturity is a public holiday, the instrument shall be deemed tobe due on the . . . . . . . . .”. This question is standard in competitive examination syllabi for Negotiable Instruments Act.
💡Key Conceptual Anchor:Negotiable Instruments Act
Question 9 of 40
★ Civil Judge
★ ADPP
★ Civil Judge
★ ADPP
Following is not the essential conditions for applicability of Section 8 of the Act -
Correct Answer: Option B — The article must be movable property
Detailed Academic Explanation:
The article must be movable property is the correct answer to “Following is not the essential conditions for applicability of Section 8 of the Act -”. This question is standard in competitive examination syllabi for Negotiable Instruments Act.
💡Key Conceptual Anchor:Negotiable Instruments Act
Question 10 of 40
★ Civil Judge
★ ADPP
★ Civil Judge
★ ADPP
The provision regarding summary procedure relating to suits upon bills of exchange, hundies and promissory notes are laid down in
Correct Answer: Option A — Order 37 of CPC
Detailed Academic Explanation:
Order 37 of CPC is the correct answer to “The provision regarding summary procedure relating to suits upon bills of exchange, hundies and promissory notes are laid down in”. This question is standard in competitive examination syllabi for Negotiable Instruments Act.
💡Key Conceptual Anchor:Negotiable Instruments Act
Question 11 of 40
★ Civil Judge
★ ADPP
★ Civil Judge
★ ADPP
In a prosecution under Secth on 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, it shall not be a defence that -
Correct Answer: Option D — That the drawer had no reason to believe when he issued the cheque that the cheque may be dishonoured on presentment
Detailed Academic Explanation:
That the drawer had no reason to believe when he issued the cheque that the cheque may be dishonoured on presentment is the correct answer to “In a prosecution under Secth on 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, it shall not be a defence that -”. This question is standard in competitive examination syllabi for Negotiable Instruments Act.
💡Key Conceptual Anchor:Negotiable Instruments Act
Question 12 of 40
★ Civil Judge
★ ADPP
★ Civil Judge
★ ADPP
Before initiating criminal proceeding for dishonour of cheque, within how many days of receipt of information about dishonour should the payee of cheque issue a notice?
Correct Answer: Option A — 15 days
Detailed Academic Explanation:
15 days is the correct answer to “Before initiating criminal proceeding for dishonour of cheque, within how many days of receipt of information about dishonour should the payee of cheque issue a notice”. This question is standard in competitive examination syllabi for Negotiable Instruments Act.
💡Key Conceptual Anchor:Negotiable Instruments Act
Question 13 of 40
★ Civil Judge
★ ADPP
★ Civil Judge
★ ADPP
The criminal complaint for dishonor of cheque is to be filled in court within . . . . . . . . of the Drawer failing to pay.
Correct Answer: Option B — 1 month
Detailed Academic Explanation:
1 month is the correct answer to “The criminal complaint for dishonor of cheque is to be filled in court within . . . . . . . . of the Drawer failing to pay.”. This question is standard in competitive examination syllabi for Negotiable Instruments Act.
💡Key Conceptual Anchor:Negotiable Instruments Act
Question 14 of 40
★ Civil Judge
★ ADPP
★ Civil Judge
★ ADPP
Which Section of the Negotiable Instruments Act defines "Negotiable Instruments"
Correct Answer: Option D — Section 13
Detailed Academic Explanation:
Section 13 is the correct answer to “Which Section of the Negotiable Instruments Act defines "Negotiable Instruments"”. This question is standard in competitive examination syllabi for Negotiable Instruments Act.
💡Key Conceptual Anchor:Negotiable Instruments Act
Question 15 of 40
★ Civil Judge
★ ADPP
★ Civil Judge
★ ADPP
If an instrument may be construed either as a promissory note or bill of exchange, it is
Correct Answer: Option B — An ambiguous instrument
Detailed Academic Explanation:
An ambiguous instrument is the correct answer to “If an instrument may be construed either as a promissory note or bill of exchange, it is”. This question is standard in competitive examination syllabi for Negotiable Instruments Act.
💡Key Conceptual Anchor:Negotiable Instruments Act
Question 16 of 40
★ Civil Judge
★ ADPP
★ Civil Judge
★ ADPP
Dishonour of cheque for insufficiency of funds etc. in the account related to
Correct Answer: Option B — Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act
Detailed Academic Explanation:
Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act is the correct answer to “Dishonour of cheque for insufficiency of funds etc. in the account related to”. This question is standard in competitive examination syllabi for Negotiable Instruments Act.
💡Key Conceptual Anchor:Negotiable Instruments Act
Question 17 of 40
★ Civil Judge
★ ADPP
★ Civil Judge
★ ADPP
For the purpose of Section 141 of The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 'company' means:
Correct Answer: Option D — All of the above
Detailed Academic Explanation:
All of the above is the correct answer to “For the purpose of Section 141 of The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 'company' means:”. This question is standard in competitive examination syllabi for Negotiable Instruments Act.
💡Key Conceptual Anchor:Negotiable Instruments Act
Question 18 of 40
★ Civil Judge
★ ADPP
★ Civil Judge
★ ADPP
To constitute an offence under Section 138, Negotiable Instruments Act, within how many days the cheque should be presented to the bank from the date on which it is drawn?
Correct Answer: Option C — 3 months
Detailed Academic Explanation:
3 months is the correct answer to “To constitute an offence under Section 138, Negotiable Instruments Act, within how many days the cheque should be presented to the bank from the date on which it is drawn”. This question is standard in competitive examination syllabi for Negotiable Instruments Act.
💡Key Conceptual Anchor:Negotiable Instruments Act
Question 19 of 40
★ Civil Judge
★ ADPP
★ Civil Judge
★ ADPP
In which provision the Court may grant time to pay court fees in complaint under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881?
Correct Answer: Option C — Section 33 of Court Fees Act, 1870
Detailed Academic Explanation:
Section 33 of Court Fees Act, 1870 is the correct answer to “In which provision the Court may grant time to pay court fees in complaint under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881”. This question is standard in competitive examination syllabi for Negotiable Instruments Act.
💡Key Conceptual Anchor:Negotiable Instruments Act
Question 20 of 40
★ Civil Judge
★ ADPP
★ Civil Judge
★ ADPP
The hirer of it motor vehicle cannot be prosecuted under section 138 after the vehicle has been repossessed and the hire purchase agreement has been terminated. The statement is
Correct Answer: Option A — True
Detailed Academic Explanation:
True is the correct answer to “The hirer of it motor vehicle cannot be prosecuted under section 138 after the vehicle has been repossessed and the hire purchase agreement has been terminated. The statement is”. This question is standard in competitive examination syllabi for Negotiable Instruments Act.
💡Key Conceptual Anchor:Negotiable Instruments Act
Question 21 of 40
★ Civil Judge
★ ADPP
★ Civil Judge
★ ADPP
Under Negotiable Instruments Act, promissory note can be drawn for minimum period of
Correct Answer: Option D — No time limit is fixed
Detailed Academic Explanation:
No time limit is fixed is the correct answer to “Under Negotiable Instruments Act, promissory note can be drawn for minimum period of”. This question is standard in competitive examination syllabi for Negotiable Instruments Act.
💡Key Conceptual Anchor:Negotiable Instruments Act
Question 22 of 40
★ Civil Judge
★ ADPP
★ Civil Judge
★ ADPP
Offences under Negotiable Instruments Act are compoundable
Correct Answer: Option B — Under section 147 Negotiable Instruments Act
Detailed Academic Explanation:
Under section 147 Negotiable Instruments Act is the correct answer to “Offences under Negotiable Instruments Act are compoundable”. This question is standard in competitive examination syllabi for Negotiable Instruments Act.
💡Key Conceptual Anchor:Negotiable Instruments Act
Question 23 of 40
★ Civil Judge
★ ADPP
★ Civil Judge
★ ADPP
Under the Limitation Act, 1963 the period of limitation for filing a suit by the payee against the drawer of a bill of exchange which has been dishonoured by non-acceptance is
Correct Answer: Option A — 3 years from the date of the refusal to accept
Detailed Academic Explanation:
3 years from the date of the refusal to accept is the correct answer to “Under the Limitation Act, 1963 the period of limitation for filing a suit by the payee against the drawer of a bill of exchange which has been dishonoured by non-acceptance is”. This question is standard in competitive examination syllabi for Negotiable Instruments Act.
💡Key Conceptual Anchor:Negotiable Instruments Act
Question 24 of 40
★ Civil Judge
★ ADPP
★ Civil Judge
★ ADPP
Drawer and payee in a Bill of exchange may be same parties.
Correct Answer: Option A — True
Detailed Academic Explanation:
True is the correct answer to “Drawer and payee in a Bill of exchange may be same parties.”. This question is standard in competitive examination syllabi for Negotiable Instruments Act.
💡Key Conceptual Anchor:Negotiable Instruments Act
Question 25 of 40
★ Civil Judge
★ ADPP
★ Civil Judge
★ ADPP
Days of grace provided to the Instruments at maturity is (as per the provisions of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881)
Correct Answer: Option C — 3 days
Detailed Academic Explanation:
3 days is the correct answer to “Days of grace provided to the Instruments at maturity is (as per the provisions of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881)”. This question is standard in competitive examination syllabi for Negotiable Instruments Act.
💡Key Conceptual Anchor:Negotiable Instruments Act
Question 26 of 40
★ Civil Judge
★ ADPP
★ Civil Judge
★ ADPP
Which of the following is not correct with regard to presentment for acceptance?
Correct Answer: Option D — The bill cannot be presented to legal presentations in case of death of drawee
Detailed Academic Explanation:
The bill cannot be presented to legal presentations in case of death of drawee is the correct answer to “Which of the following is not correct with regard to presentment for acceptance”. This question is standard in competitive examination syllabi for Negotiable Instruments Act.
💡Key Conceptual Anchor:Negotiable Instruments Act
Question 27 of 40
★ Civil Judge
★ ADPP
★ Civil Judge
★ ADPP
A' signs instruments in the following terms, which instruments are promissory note under Section 4 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881?
Correct Answer: Option A — I promise to pay 'B' or order Rs. 500/- to be paid on demand
Detailed Academic Explanation:
I promise to pay 'B' or order Rs. 500/- to be paid on demand is the correct answer to “A' signs instruments in the following terms, which instruments are promissory note under Section 4 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881”. This question is standard in competitive examination syllabi for Negotiable Instruments Act.
💡Key Conceptual Anchor:Negotiable Instruments Act
Question 28 of 40
★ Civil Judge
★ ADPP
★ Civil Judge
★ ADPP
In which of the following cases the Supreme Court gave guidelines for speedy and expeditious trial of cheque bouncing cases
Correct Answer: Option C — Dashrath Rupsingh Rathod v. State of Maharashtra
Detailed Academic Explanation:
Dashrath Rupsingh Rathod v. State of Maharashtra is the correct answer to “In which of the following cases the Supreme Court gave guidelines for speedy and expeditious trial of cheque bouncing cases”. This question is standard in competitive examination syllabi for Negotiable Instruments Act.
💡Key Conceptual Anchor:Negotiable Instruments Act
Question 29 of 40
★ Civil Judge
★ ADPP
★ Civil Judge
★ ADPP
Which among the following is not true with respect to negotiable instruments?
Correct Answer: Option B — A cheque cannot be considered as a bill of exchange
Detailed Academic Explanation:
A cheque cannot be considered as a bill of exchange is the correct answer to “Which among the following is not true with respect to negotiable instruments”. This question is standard in competitive examination syllabi for Negotiable Instruments Act.
💡Key Conceptual Anchor:Negotiable Instruments Act
Question 30 of 40
★ Civil Judge
★ ADPP
★ Civil Judge
★ ADPP
Under Negotiable Instruments Act, for filing a complaint under section 138 of the Act essential condition is -
Correct Answer: Option B — The cheque was returned for insufficient funds in the account
Detailed Academic Explanation:
The cheque was returned for insufficient funds in the account is the correct answer to “Under Negotiable Instruments Act, for filing a complaint under section 138 of the Act essential condition is -”. This question is standard in competitive examination syllabi for Negotiable Instruments Act.
💡Key Conceptual Anchor:Negotiable Instruments Act
Question 31 of 40
★ Civil Judge
★ ADPP
★ Civil Judge
★ ADPP
Which of the following is a correct statement of law as per Sections 138 and 142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881?
Correct Answer: Option D — All the above
Detailed Academic Explanation:
All the above is the correct answer to “Which of the following is a correct statement of law as per Sections 138 and 142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881”. This question is standard in competitive examination syllabi for Negotiable Instruments Act.
💡Key Conceptual Anchor:Negotiable Instruments Act
Question 32 of 40
★ Civil Judge
★ ADPP
★ Civil Judge
★ ADPP
In which of the following judgments has the Supreme Court held that only those courts within whose territorial limits the drawee bank is situated, would have jurisdiction to try the cases for offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881?
Correct Answer: Option B — Dashrath Rupsingh Rathood v. State of Maharashtra and Another, (2014) 9 SCC 129
Detailed Academic Explanation:
Dashrath Rupsingh Rathood v. State of Maharashtra and Another, (2014) 9 SCC 129 is the correct answer to “In which of the following judgments has the Supreme Court held that only those courts within whose territorial limits the drawee bank is situated, would have jurisdiction to try the cases for offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881”. This question is standard in competitive examination syllabi for Negotiable Instruments Act.
💡Key Conceptual Anchor:Negotiable Instruments Act
Question 33 of 40
★ Civil Judge
★ ADPP
★ Civil Judge
★ ADPP
Can the Magistrate order an investigation on the allegation of an offence under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act?
Correct Answer: Option B — No
Detailed Academic Explanation:
No is the correct answer to “Can the Magistrate order an investigation on the allegation of an offence under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act”. This question is standard in competitive examination syllabi for Negotiable Instruments Act.
💡Key Conceptual Anchor:Negotiable Instruments Act
Question 34 of 40
★ Civil Judge
★ ADPP
★ Civil Judge
★ ADPP
In which of the following cases the Supreme Court held that the provisions of Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 do not contain a condition that the prosecution of a company is sine qua non for prosecution of other persons. The liability of the Directors/Officers etc. is vicarious and will flow from the liability of the company/firm.
Correct Answer: Option D — Mohd. Isaq Gulsani v. Rajamouli
Detailed Academic Explanation:
Mohd. Isaq Gulsani v. Rajamouli is the correct answer to “In which of the following cases the Supreme Court held that the provisions of Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 do not contain a condition that the prosecution of a company is sine qua non for prosecution of other persons. The liability of the Directors/Officers etc. is vicarious and will flow from the liability of the company/firm.”. This question is standard in competitive examination syllabi for Negotiable Instruments Act.
💡Key Conceptual Anchor:Negotiable Instruments Act
Question 35 of 40
★ Civil Judge
★ ADPP
★ Civil Judge
★ ADPP
Under section 118 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, the onus of proving absence of consideration in the execution of a negotiable instrument is on the
Correct Answer: Option B — Executant (Zohra Jan v. Rajan Bibi, 28 IC 402)
Detailed Academic Explanation:
Executant (Zohra Jan v. Rajan Bibi, 28 IC 402) is the correct answer to “Under section 118 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, the onus of proving absence of consideration in the execution of a negotiable instrument is on the”. This question is standard in competitive examination syllabi for Negotiable Instruments Act.
💡Key Conceptual Anchor:Negotiable Instruments Act
Question 36 of 40
★ Civil Judge
★ ADPP
★ Civil Judge
★ ADPP
Can a drawer escape from his liability?
Correct Answer: Option B — Yes, a drawer can limit or exclude his liability by inserting in the bill an express stipulation to that effect
Detailed Academic Explanation:
Yes, a drawer can limit or exclude his liability by inserting in the bill an express stipulation to that effect is the correct answer to “Can a drawer escape from his liability”. This question is standard in competitive examination syllabi for Negotiable Instruments Act.
💡Key Conceptual Anchor:Negotiable Instruments Act
Question 37 of 40
★ Civil Judge
★ ADPP
★ Civil Judge
★ ADPP
The indorsement of a negotiable instrument followed by delivery
Correct Answer: Option C — Transfers to the indorsee the property in the bill
Detailed Academic Explanation:
Transfers to the indorsee the property in the bill is the correct answer to “The indorsement of a negotiable instrument followed by delivery”. This question is standard in competitive examination syllabi for Negotiable Instruments Act.
💡Key Conceptual Anchor:Negotiable Instruments Act
Question 38 of 40
★ Civil Judge
★ ADPP
★ Civil Judge
★ ADPP
Who is entitled to make a complaint for taking cognizance of the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881?
Correct Answer: Option C — Only the holder of the cheque
Detailed Academic Explanation:
Only the holder of the cheque is the correct answer to “Who is entitled to make a complaint for taking cognizance of the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881”. This question is standard in competitive examination syllabi for Negotiable Instruments Act.
💡Key Conceptual Anchor:Negotiable Instruments Act
Question 39 of 40
★ Civil Judge
★ ADPP
★ Civil Judge
★ ADPP
Which of the Section of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 provides that "where a person is nominated as a Director of a company by virtue of his holding any office or employment in the Central Government or the State Government, as the case may be, he shall not be held liable for an-offence under Section 138 of the Act, committed by a company?"
Correct Answer: Option B — Proviso (two) to Section 141(1)
Detailed Academic Explanation:
Proviso (two) to Section 141(1) is the correct answer to “Which of the Section of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 provides that "where a person is nominated as a Director of a company by virtue of his holding any office or employment in the Central Government or the State Government, as the case may be, he shall not be held liable for an-offence under Section 138 of the Act, committed by a company?"”. This question is standard in competitive examination syllabi for Negotiable Instruments Act.
💡Key Conceptual Anchor:Negotiable Instruments Act
Question 40 of 40
★ Civil Judge
★ ADPP
★ Civil Judge
★ ADPP
A' signs an instrument in writing as under 'On demand, I promise, I promise to pay 'B' the sum of Rs. 10,000'. What is this called?
Correct Answer: Option C — Promissory note
Detailed Academic Explanation:
Promissory note is the correct answer to “A' signs an instrument in writing as under 'On demand, I promise, I promise to pay 'B' the sum of Rs. 10,000'. What is this called”. This question is standard in competitive examination syllabi for Negotiable Instruments Act.
💡Key Conceptual Anchor:Negotiable Instruments Act
✓Link copied to clipboard
Continue Your Practice
Arbitration And Conciliation Act — Part 1
Master the next curriculum module with 40 exam-standard MCQs.
In competitive commission exams (FPSC, PPSC, KPPSC, SPSC, CSS, PMS), questions are frequently phrased with distractor options designed to catch rote learners. Whenever you answer an MCQ, read the Detailed Academic Explanation and Conceptual Anchor to understand why the remaining options are incorrect.